Phase None Completed NCT05133921

The Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Drug-coated Balloon in Coronary Lesions: a Real-World, All-Comers ,Single-center, Prospective Study

Xijing Hospital · Observational

11 views
Rate this page
Completed December 2020. Read the results summary below →
Study context Single-site study

Overview

Drug-Coated Balloon (DCB) angioplasty is similar to plain old balloon angioplasty procedurally, but there is an anti-proliferative medication paclitaxel coated on the balloon. Treating in-stent restenosis (ISR) with the DCB has the theoretical advantage of avoiding multiple stent layers and respecting the vessel anatomy. DCB has shown promising results for the treatment of ISR. Currently, DCB has a Class I indication to treat ISR recommended by European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines. In addition, some interventional cardiologist has also applied DCB in de novo lesions in their clinical practice. Although some small sample size RCTs and observational studies have suggested that the clinical prognosis of DCB in primary large vessels is non-inferior to drug-eluting stent (DES), there is no large-scale RCT or cohort studies to compare the clinical effects of DCB and DES. Despite several theoretical benefits of DCB, the procedural-related complications cannot be entirely prevented, such as acute elastic retraction and severe dissection, which would affect coronary blood flow or lead to acute vascular occlusion. Some studies have suggested that optimization of the procedural technique can reduce the occurrence of complications and target lesion failure in the long-term. Proposed criteria include adapting cutting or scoring balloon for pre-dilatation, residual stenosis\<30% post-DCB, maintaining TIMI flow=3, DCB dilation time\<60s, and appropriate balloon to vessel ratio\> 0.91. However, such proposed technique and criteria have not been evaluated in the real-world clinical practice. This current study is designed to investigate the efficacy and safety of DCB in the real world and exploring the optimal procedural configurations.

Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT ID NCT05133921).

Results summary

None

Outcome data

EndpointTypeResultSignificance
Device-oriented Composite Endpoint (DoCE) Primary None None

Full results record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

Study design

Phase
Phase None
Study type
Observational
Enrollment (final)
2,487 participants
Started
December 2015
Actually completed
December 2020

Recruitment criteria

Age range: All ages · Sex: All · Healthy volunteers: Requires diagnosis

Locationsi

1 site participated during the trial period. Representative sites shown below; full historical record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

Ling Tao — Xi'an, Shannxi (China)

Sources

REG
ClinicalTrials.gov — NCT05133921
Trial registry · primary record
How would you rate this page?
Your feedback helps us improve the quality of our content.
What did you like about this page?
What did you not like about this page?
Is there anything else you'd like to see covered?
Report an error
All reports are reviewed before any changes are made.
What type of error are you reporting?
Which section does this relate to?
Please describe the error
Be as specific as possible — include the correct information if you know it.
Highlight mode — select the text containing the error
Click and drag over the relevant text, then click Confirm.
Thank you
Your response helps us improve the quality of this page.